|

Trey Phillips, Sharon Wilder and Marci
Charpentier
Hamilton Middle School
Cypress-Fairbanks ISD
Cypress, TX
Abstract
| Introduction |
Methods | Results
| Discussion |
Acknowledgements | Literature
Cited | Research Projects
In this experiment we looked for a relationship between
the age of female monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus)
and the sex ratio of their offspring. Three mated females of the
same age were placed in a cage. We collected the eggs laid by these
females on three days corresponding with when they were seven, fourteen,
and twenty-one days old. We then raised the larvae from these collected
eggs and recorded the sex of each resulting adult. Using a Chi-square
analysis, we did not find a statistically significant association
between the age of the females and the sex ratio of the offspring
when we examined the data from the three days.
The monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) is
easily identified by its distinctive orange and black coloration
and can be found throughout the Midwestern states during the summer
months. This butterfly is best known for its ability to migrate
long distances each fall to reach sites in Mexico where it spends
the winter before returning to the United States the following spring
(Grace 1997). While much research has been completed on various
aspects of monarch biology and ecology, many aspects of its population
ecology remain understudied. For example, although it is known that
overall sex ratios in monarch populations are approximately 50/50,
it is not known what factors might influence sex ratios in monarchs,
or whether these ratios ever vary (K. Oberhauser, pers. comm.).
We decided to look for a relationship between the age of female
monarchs and the sex ratio of their offspring. Research has indicated
that certain species of insects are able to vary the sex ratio of
their offspring (Thornhill & Alcock 1983). Research has also
revealed that in the monarch female, as the female ages and loses
body mass, the female lays smaller eggs (Oberhauser 1997). We wondered
if the ratio of male to female offspring would change as the female
monarch aged. We developed the following three hypotheses to test.
HA-1: The younger the female monarch, the
more female offspring she will produce.
HA-2: The younger the female monarch, the
more male offspring she will produce.
HO: The age of the female monarch will
have no effect on the sex ratio of the offspring.
We conducted our experiment on the campus of Hamilton
Middle School in Cypress, Texas. Our equipment included one hanging
butterfly cage made of bridal net used for the egg-laying females,
forty tote boxes with screen tops, five aquariums with screen tops,
fifty plastic florist water vials, twenty-five four-inch pots of
Asclepias curassavica, and over fifty one-gallon pots of
A. curassavica. Fluorescent lights in the classroom were
left on for twelve hours and off for twelve hours. The temperature
remained constant at approximately 78 degrees Fahrenheit.
We initially received two mated females from the University
of Minnesota. We placed the females in individual cages and fed
them a 20% honey/water solution placed on sponges. Unfortunately,
these butterflies died after several days without laying any eggs.
We then decided to use butterflies that we had raised in our classroom.
The eggs for these butterflies came from a teacher in Victoria,
Texas. Since we were concerned with our ability to keep butterflies
alive in cages long enough to retrieve eggs for the experiment,
we decided to mate five butterflies that had eclosed on the same
day in our room. We placed three of the mated female butterflies
together in one hanging cage and did not attempt to keep records
of each individual butterfly but instead used the total number of
eggs layed each day. Since we intended to combine the numbers per
day rather than per butterfly for our analysis at the end of the
experiment, we did not believe it was necessary to separate the
females during the egg laying process.
We first placed three mated females in a hanging cage
with one four-inch plant of A. curassavica. The butterflies
were fed hummingbird nectar prepared from a commercial brand of
instant hummingbird food. We put the nectar on sponges placed on
the bottom half of petri dishes in the bottom of the cage. We also
sprayed the cage occasionally with water from a spray bottle. Spraying
the butterflies with water seemed to encourage them to eat. When
we noticed eggs on the milkweed, we began the experiment. At 8:00AM
on Wednesday, September 15, 1999, we removed one plant of milkweed
and replaced it with a new plant. This new plant of milkweed was
left in the hanging cage for twenty-four hours until 8:00AM on Thursday,
September 16, 1999. The milkweed was removed from the cage and the
eggs were counted. A fresh plant of milkweed was placed in the cage
each day at 8:00AM but we only sampled three days, September 16,
23, and 30. We left the eggs on the milkweed until they hatched.
When the eggs on each of these milkweed plants hatched, we placed
the larvae in tote boxes with fresh cuttings of A. curassavica.
The milkweed cuttings were put in plastic florist vials filled with
water to keep the milkweed fresh for the larvae. As the larvae grew,
we separated them into additional tote boxes to prevent crowding.
Some of the larvae were placed in aquariums so students could more
easily observe the development. Each tote box and aquarium was labeled
with the date the eggs were laid. Tote boxes were cleaned and larvae
were fed fresh milkweed on a daily basis. The larvae pupated on
the screen tops of the tote boxes and aquariums. We had originally
intended to raise all the eggs laid by the three females, not just
those from our three sampling days, but we soon ran out of room
and began giving the excess to neighboring classrooms. As the adult
butterflies emerged, we recorded the sex of the butterfly. The butterflies
were numbered and then released. The sex of each offspring was recorded
based on the date of the egg was laid, not the date of emergence.
The results from our experiment are recorded in Table
1. We used a Chi-square test to analyze the data.
| Date |
Age
in days |
#
Females |
#
Males |
Totals |
16-Sep |
7 |
45 |
42 |
87 |
23-Sep |
14 |
142 |
153 |
295 |
30-Sep |
21 |
75 |
59 |
134 |
| Totals |
-- |
262 |
254 |
516 |
Table 1. Sex ratios in offspring
from 3 female monarchs. These are the observed values for
the Chi-square test.
| Date |
Age
in days |
#
Females |
#
Males |
Totals |
16-Sep |
7 |
44 |
43 |
87 |
23-Sep |
14 |
150 |
145 |
295 |
30-Sep |
21 |
68 |
66 |
134 |
| Totals |
-- |
262 |
254 |
516 |
Table 2. Expected sex ratio
values for Chi-square test.
Since the calculated chi-square value was not greater
than the critical value, we were unable to reject our null hypothesis
(Calculated Chi-square= 2.37, Critical Chi-square=5.99 @ 95%, 4.61
@ 90%, d.f.=2).
Overall, we did not find a statistically significant
relationship between the age of the female and the sex ratio of
her offspring. However, during the experiment we lost approximately
fifty percent of our pupae to an infestation of Ophryocystis
elektroscirrha and this loss may have distorted our data. As
soon as we became aware of the problem, we examined each of our
adult butterflies by taking a sample of scales from the abdomen
area and examining the scales under a microscope. We froze and disposed
of any infected adults, sterilized all of our equipment with a 20%
bleach solution, and cut back all of the milkweed. Since we believe
there is a possibility that such a high incidence of infected pupae
may have influenced the outcome of the experiment, we would like
to see the experiment repeated with healthy females. We also would
be interested in repeating this experiment to investigate the effect
of changing the variables of daylight hours and temperature to mimic
spring, summer, and fall weather conditions. We also wonder if the
number of times a female is mated might influence the sex ratio
of her offspring. Obviously, we have concluded that we still have
many unanswered questions.
Acknowledgements
We thank Karen Oberhauser, Michelle Prysby, and Bill
Calvert for their help and guidance during this project. We also
thank teachers and students at Hamilton Middle School for help raising
the monarch larvae and recording data. The National Science Foundation
(ESI-9731429) and the Monarchs in the Classroom program at the University
of Minnesota supported our research.
Grace, E.S. 1997. The World of the Monarch Butterfly.
Sierra Club Books.
Oberhauser, K. S. 1997. Fecundity, lifespan and egg
mass in butterflies: effects of male- derived nutrients and female
size. Functional Ecology. 11, 166-175.
Thornhill, R. and Allicock, J. 1983. The Evolution
of Insect Mating Systems. Harvard University Press.
Back
to top | Vital Statistics
| Student/Teacher Research
| Research Topics
| Site Overview
|